The moment when dialogue with the machine ceases to be a request and becomes a mirror.
Just as a mirror does not tell us who we are but shows us how we appear, AI does not think for us. It compels us to clarify what we want, to formulate better, and to choose our words.
— From the prologue of Prompt Ergo Sum, 2025
A continuing notebook on language, thought, and the dialogic turn in artificial intelligence.
From the notebook
What Is Still Worth Teaching?
The real revolution is not about what a machine can do. It is about what we will continue to ask of human beings.
For centuries, school administered the scarcity of knowledge. Now that answers are abundant, value shifts to what remains rare: the question, and the judgment to choose it.
Whoever Writes the Metric Owns the Future
Argentina is moving to hand AI a legal key. The whole debate skips the only question that matters: who writes the metric by which intelligence is measured?
The Rerum Novarum of the Algorithmic Age
What a papal encyclical on artificial intelligence reveals about who gets to write the moral code of the age that is coming
The problem is no longer whether AI will become powerful. The problem is who will possess the right to write the moral code of the age that is coming.
The End of Indispensability
Artificial intelligence is not erasing the value of the tech class — it is showing who had real competence and who was living off a scarcity rent
For years we confused scarcity with value. AI does not break the monopoly by proving itself superior — it breaks it by making a measurable, comparable, debatable alternative exist.